One buy, held to the end. See how the bot's backtest stacks up against simply holding Bitcoin, Ethereum, the S&P 500 and more — up to five at once, on real prices.
Rather drip-feed than buy all at once? This page assumes one buy, held to the end. If you'd add a fixed amount every month instead, that's dollar-cost averaging — see how it changes the math.
Try the DCA simulator →Did the bot beat just holding?
This is the simplest, fairest question you can ask a trading strategy: would you have done better just buying and holding? Pick the bot and up to four assets, and let the curves settle it on real prices — same money in, same dates, no cherry-picking.
WiseBot is built to lose less when markets fall and still earn something — not to win every bull run. Sometimes plain holding wins. The chart won't pretend otherwise.
What a one-time investment, held to the end, would have grown to — the WiseBot backtest next to a plain buy-and-hold of the assets you pick, all rebased to the same starting amount so the lines are directly comparable. It answers 'did the bot beat just holding?', not 'when should I have bought?' (that's the DCA simulator).
Buy and hold: the full amount goes in on the first month and stays in. DCA — adding a fixed amount every month — is a different question, and it lives on the DCA simulator.
Because WiseBot's backtest covers May 2023 to June 2026, and the comparison is clamped to that window so nobody gets a head start. Remove WiseBot from the selection and the window can stretch back as far as the assets' own history allows.
No. It is a backtest of the production book (trend-following + funding carry on BTC/ETH/SOL). It is not a live track record and past results don't predict the future.
Real monthly historical closing prices, price-return only — dividends, staking and funding yield are excluded across every asset so the comparison stays fair. Each series is rebased to the same starting amount at the first shared month.