The bot tries to beat buy-and-hold. This tool shows you, honestly, whether it should even bother — on real historical prices.
Want the head-to-head instead? DCA is about when you buy. To see how WiseBot's curve stacks up against simply holding Bitcoin, Ethereum or the S&P 500 — up to five at once — compare buy & hold.
Compare buy & hold →For most people, boring wins
If you have no edge and no time, dollar-cost averaging — buying a fixed amount on a fixed schedule, through the ups and the downs — is brutally hard to beat. From Warren Buffett to every index-fund book ever written, it's the one thing nearly everyone agrees on.
The bot exists to try to do better — less drawdown, a return that earns even when the market falls. Sometimes it will. Sometimes plain DCA wins. We put them side by side on real prices and let you decide. Same money in, same dates, no cherry-picking.
Per-asset calculators
Buying a fixed amount on a fixed schedule — through the ups and the downs — instead of trying to time the market. It removes timing risk and is brutally hard to beat if you have no edge and no time.
Yes. Real monthly historical closing prices for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100, price-return only (dividends, staking and funding yield excluded for a fair comparison). The inflation view uses US CPI.
Yes, on every asset — the green line is a backtest of the WiseBot production book (trend + carry on BTC/ETH/SOL). On the stock pages it's shown as a crypto alternative to DCA-ing the index. It is not a live track record and past results don't predict the future.
It depends on the period. Lump sum wins more often in long bull runs; DCA wins in choppy or down markets and removes timing risk. Try both above.